The Damaging Impact of Religion in Public Space on Democracy

Democracy is founded on the principles of equality, freedom, and pluralism. It thrives when citizens can express their diverse views and participate in decision-making processes without fear of discrimination or exclusion. However, the intrusion of religion, particularly Hindutva ideology, into public space can undermine these democratic ideals and pose significant challenges. This article explores how the presence of Hindutva ideology in public discourse and policy-making can damage democracy.

• Undermining Secularism:

Secularism, the separation of religion and state, is a fundamental pillar of democracy. The rise of Hindutva ideology in India has challenged the secular fabric of society. For example, the Babri Masjid demolition in 1992, carried out by Hindutva activists, violated the principles of secularism and led to communal tensions. The privileging of Hinduism and the promotion of Hindutva-based policies can marginalize minority faiths, erode the secular nature of the state, and undermine religious freedom for non-Hindus.

• Exclusion and Discrimination:

Hindutva ideology in public space fosters an environment that perpetuates exclusion and discrimination. The Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) in India, which was seen by critics as a manifestation of Hindutva ideology, selectively granted citizenship based on religious affiliation, excluding Muslims. This policy generated widespread protests, highlighting the discriminatory nature of Hindutva-driven initiatives and their impact on minority communities.

• Hindrance to Rational Decision-Making:

Public policy decisions should be based on reason, evidence, and the overall welfare of society. However, the influence of Hindutva ideology can hinder rational decision-making. For instance, the controversy surrounding the Taj Mahal, one of India's most iconic monuments, was fueled by Hindutva narratives questioning its historical significance based on religious interpretations. This erosion of rationality impedes progress and diverts attention away from crucial issues such as poverty alleviation, education, and healthcare.

• Polarization and Conflict:

Hindutva ideology in public space can exacerbate social and political divisions, leading to polarization and conflict. Communal violence, such as the 2002 Gujarat riots, highlighted the destructive consequences of sectarian politics influenced by Hindutva ideology. The exploitation of religious sentiments for political gain further deepens societal divisions, hindering dialogue and cooperation necessary for a healthy democracy.

• Impediment to Individual Autonomy:

Democracy recognizes and upholds individual autonomy, granting citizens the freedom to make choices based on their own values, beliefs, and conscience. However, Hindutva ideology in public space can restrict this autonomy. For instance, the controversial "Love Jihad" laws proposed by certain states in India seek to regulate interfaith marriages, infringing on personal choices and targeting specific religious communities. Such measures curtail individual liberties and undermine the democratic principles of personal freedom and autonomy.

The damaging impact of religion, specifically Hindutva ideology, in public space on democracy is evident through various examples. From undermining secularism and promoting exclusion and discrimination to hindering rational decision-making, fueling polarization, and impeding individual autonomy, Hindutva-driven narratives and policies pose significant challenges to democratic principles. Balancing religious freedom with the secular nature of public governance is crucial for safeguarding democracy's core values. By promoting inclusive dialogue, respect for diverse perspectives, and the separation of Hindutva ideology from the state, societies can strive towards upholding democratic principles and protecting citizens from the damaging effects of religious intrusion in public space.

-Sunny Gusain

* Views are personal